Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 3661 - 3680
of 23,969
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm
Unsurprisingly, after class last Fall, a student at Rutgers Law School in New Jersey asked a professor about one of those 10,000+ cases—State v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
But there are three arguments against it, any single one of which is reason enough for Apple to internalize 100% of DST:Contractual: DST wasn't foreseeable when Apple set its original App Store terms (i.e., at a time when Apple claims it didn't have market power).Policy (legislative intent): Lawmakers wanted "GAFA" companies to internalize those taxes. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:53 am
You don’t even need to state a reason for your 1203 motion to vacate within 30 days. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:45 pm
This post includes that intiial address in the original Spanish with a crude English translation, along with brief reflections on the state of Caribbean Marxism (considered in more detail here) in Cuba and its potential future course. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:30 pm
In Hamen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am
, United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
Apple antitrust trial kicks off on Monday.IP Bridge is a Japanese state-owned licensing firm (link to IAM article), or non-practicing entity (NPE), or if you'd rather have it the disparaging way, a "sovereign patent troll. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm
§ 1326(d), was enacted by Congress after the court’s 1987 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 2:41 pm
Holloman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV, Case C-149/11 indicates the use needed to support an EU registration, as follows:a) Territorial scope of use is one of the relevant factors;b) It cannot be ruled out that use in a single member state can support an EU registration;c) Use needs to be sufficient or create or maintain a market share;d) No de minimus level of use can be defined.Other factors to consider include the scale and frequency of use, the nature of use, and the nature… [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:03 am
From Sitelock LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:19 am
Gutnick hasn’t yet filed his answer to what remains of the complaint or any counterclaim. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:58 am
This is completely optional, but it is important to state clearly whether or not you will be using this approach. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am
Res Judicata And Collateral Estoppel When A Divorce Case Is Moved To Another State Res Judicata is most useful when a party moves to another state and files a post-judgment divorce motion in that state in the hopes to undo a ruling they didn’t like from the last judge in the prior state. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
United States Dep't of Labor, 477 F. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
