Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 7,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
Sackett v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 9:13 pm
Boulis v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:14 am
Highlights this week included: Wikileaks cables show massive U.S. effort to establish Canadian DMCA (Michael Geist) (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) Wikileaks on New Zealand copyright: US funds IP enforcement, offers to draft legislation (Michael Geist) (ArsTechnica) Long-running TiVo patent battle settled for $500 million: TiVo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:50 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:54 pm
[1] Clapper v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:08 pm
The second case, Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm
Solicitor General Elena Kagan will then argue for the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
ABC is seeking to rely on a new public interest defence in a defamation battle with former elite soldier and Australian Values Party founder Heston Russell, who claims the broadcaster wrongly accused him of war crimes. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
That song is also the focus of his legal battle with Rick Ross.William Leonard Roberts II, better known as Rick Ross, is a rapper who hails from Florida; he became popular following his debut single, Hustlin'. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
As an article on NBC.com noted, “For decades, it was the Republican Party that benefited from conservative anger over the Supreme Court’s original ruling in Roe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 7:22 pm
The case is SureFire, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
" So the case of State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:28 am
To understand the dispute, one has to go back to the relatively new State of New York law that requires the prosecution to provide to the defense, in sufficient time to prepare for trial, all relevant documents (CPL section 245.20). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:13 am
But Pidgeon and Hicks are in for an uphill battle since their argument is contrary to an order upheld by a federal appeals court shortly after Obergefell stating that officials in Texas and other states were forbidden from enforcing any state law “prohibiting a person from marrying another person of the same sex or recognizing same-sex marriage” (De Leon v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
EPA and West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm
Perry v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:51 am
Two decades ago, in Ortega v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The point of departure in the argument in Egbert v. [read post]
