Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 29,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 2:12 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
Second, the framers of the Civil Rights Act sought to enforce the “privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states” protected under Article IV and described in the antebellum case Corfield v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court most recently relied on that rationale in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:30 am
Bingham’s colleagues in the Thirty-Ninth Congress were well-informed about, and shared a consensus view of, Article IV, Section 2 and cases like Corfield v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:05 pm
In the ACPA, Congress provided a safe harbor for domain name registrars (15 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:08 am
In Harbison v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:37 pm
Association for Medical Pathology & ACLU v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:37 pm
Association for Medical Pathology & ACLU v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
They contend that Congress gave the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and National Governing Bodies (NGB)—like USA Cycling—exclusive jurisdiction over eligibility for competitions. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm
Co., 348 U.S. 310, 321 (1955) ("We, like Congress, leave the regulation of marine insurance where it has been — with the States. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm
Transfers to the United States will be illegal, as will construction of facilities in the United States to house detainees. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Furthermore, Article V of the Constitution specifically empowers Congress to do only two things: (1) “propose” amendments, and (2) select one of two “modes” of ratification (state conventions or ratification by state legislatures). [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Furthermore, Article V of the Constitution specifically empowers Congress to do only two things: (1) “propose” amendments, and (2) select one of two “modes” of ratification (state conventions or ratification by state legislatures). [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:20 am
The summary judgment hearing in Tafas v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
To read the Court’s opinion in the case, Astrue v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:18 pm
It was not until NFIB v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:15 pm
In McNally v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:19 am
In the current term, the United States Supreme Court granted cert in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
