Search for: "State v. Craft" Results 3661 - 3680 of 3,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm by Mateusz Rachubka
In response to the comments, SESAC has stated that it “wholeheartedly supports the goals of the Music Modernization Act and wants those goals made law — just like you do. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
Under the UCC, as a general rule, all types of goods held on consignment (not just art) are subject to claims of the consignee-dealer’s creditors while in the consignee’s possession unless the consignor has complied with the UCC’s requirements of publicly filing a notice stating that the consignor holds a security interest in the consigned work of art. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
Acutely aware of the need to separate politics from the divisive forces of religion, the Founding Fathers crafted a constitution that expressed the fundamental values of the Enlightenment. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm by admin
As we all know by now, after the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am by Ron Coleman
 He focuses rightly on the seminal case of American Waltham Watch Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:21 pm
. ________________________________________ LANDLORD'S WAIVER: "A MUST DOCUMENT" By Barry V. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Particularly as the written testimony from Jeff Smith, Partner in Charge of Environmental Practice, Cravath, Swaine, and Moore, indicated, the issue of crafting appropriate disclosure obligations is a complicated one. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:28 am by WSLL
Many undeniably independent professionals worked with grantor in crafting and executing her estate plan. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Justin (Gus) Hurwitz
The Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in FCC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court summed up how the severability doctrine is to work in a 1992 decision, New York v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Molly E. Reynolds
And there’s a good reason for that: “legislative vetoes” and other conditional authorizations that try to circumvent the normal legislative process are generally seen as unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]