Search for: "State v. Harris"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 5,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am
Gaskin v Harris 2012 NY Slip Op 06123 Decided on September 12, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department . [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
Recently, in EEOC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:39 am
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:42 am
Judge Harry Leinenweber of the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:30 am
[1] The case is captioned Sykes v Mel Harris and Associates, LLC, et al., US Dist Ct SDNY 09-Civ 8486, Chin, J., September 4, 2012, and the opinion is currently available on Westlaw at 2012 WL 3834802 and in the New York Law Journal here [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:37 pm
Holder and Nix v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
Anderson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Second Department Holds Wife of 30 Year Marriage Who Worked Only 3 Years During Marriage Properly Denied Maintenance Where She Was Highly Educated and Similarly Situated to the Defendant In Carr-Harris v Carr-Harris,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 3204572 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) plaintiff and the defendant were married for more than 30 years, during which time the defendant worked as a church minister. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:57 am
See Bonito Boats, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
In granting the motion, the court determined, inter alia, that defendants established as a matter of law that plaintiff is unable to prove that defendants' [*2]negligence is a proximate cause of plaintiff's damages (see Robbins v Harris Beach & Wilcox, 291 AD2d 797, 798). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
Francis College v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
In the words of Justice Harry Blackmun’s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 12:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
HARRY M. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Harris – a case involving the reliability of testing protocols related to drug sniffing dogs (is more than a “certification” statement required); Chaidez v. [read post]
