Search for: "State v. Price" Results 3661 - 3680 of 11,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
(Articles, F)That supervisory function is not exclusive and the articles specifically suggest a role for the State Inspectorate Organization or the State Financial Tribunal Organization. [read post]
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant paid royalty fees at a price lower than the commercial price, and improperly deducted a state conservation fee that the defendant, not the royalty owners, was required to pay. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
The order was made in the proceedings of a batch of civil writ petitions dubbed Rakesh Vaishnav & Ors. v Union of India challenging the constitutional validity of the three farm laws as well as the validity of the protests by the farmers against these laws. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 2:35 pm by admin
However, in an interesting decision handed down earlier today (Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
Price    Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0264n.06 Sanchez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
    The Court concluded that “[t]he ‘Purchase Price’ provision of the agreement expressly states that the price of the shares of stock shall be ‘an amount agreed upon annually by the Stockholders as set forth on the attached Schedule A. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
    The Court concluded that “[t]he ‘Purchase Price’ provision of the agreement expressly states that the price of the shares of stock shall be ‘an amount agreed upon annually by the Stockholders as set forth on the attached Schedule A. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Circuit opinion in the controversial E15 (15 ethanol mix with gasoline) split decision in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]