Search for: "State v. Su" Results 3661 - 3680 of 30,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2011, 5:57 am by Steven M. Gursten
Plaintiff sued alleging that she suffered a serious impairment of body function under MCL 500.3135(1) and (7). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
The plaintiffs sued Lockheed and various manufacturers of beryllium parts in Georgia state court alleging a number of claims, of which only the failure-to-warn claims remain. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
(plaintiff John Doe sued Indiana University after he was expelled for physically abusing female student), and Doe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law § 297[9] and… [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am by New York Criminal Defense
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of  Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday's disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us - People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:08 am by Woodrow Pollack
No.Blue Water Dynamics, LLC has sued Anthony Kalil for copyright infringement, but Blue Water is having difficulty serving Kalil. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
  On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  In its broadest sense, the doctrine holds that a regulated entity cannot be sued for charging allegedly excessive rates if those rates were filed with a federal or state regulator. [read post]