Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm
Sullivan), and movie theatres (Freedman v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm
On 19 May 2017, in the case of Dreyer v O’Sullivan, a psychiatrist was been granted a without notice harassment injunction against an ex-patient who has been harassing him. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am
Sullivan (2024), Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2024-52. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
We may not be representative of different companies b/c we are small & receive a small number of requests that vary in what they ask for—readership over a period of time v. individual info. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Lee v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
In Wilkow v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:27 pm
Why King v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 376 U. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
The nursing standard of care in Illinois: rethinking the Wingo exception in the wake of … (Sullivan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
Lefoumba v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
SULLIVAN, J., dissents with separate opinion. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
FTC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:33 am
Iqbal[x] and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
