Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 6,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
In Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
People should be able to use copyrighted work in ways that benefit us all, without worrying that a court will bankrupt them if the court later decides they crossed a fuzzy line. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
Compare Bland v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:12 am
(Cross-posted on my nascent personal blog at nancyleong.com) [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm
A cross-party consensus developed with the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrats all committing to reform in their last general election manifestos after 60,000 people backed the Libel Reform Campaign’s call for change. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
Crawford v Washington and People v Brown held that the Confrontation Clause bars the admission of testimonial out-of-court statements made by a witness who is not subject to cross-examination. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:25 am
Case citation: Sen v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:34 am
The Supreme Court of Canada last week, in Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Thus, generally, cross motions do not "'obviate a plenary trial of disputed issues of fact, where such exists; nor do cross-motions constitute a waiver by the litigants to such a trial.'" [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
On June 25, 2013 the Supreme Court's assessment of the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
., Habush v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 1:40 pm
It is to be noted that the key is whether the defendant has been afforded an opportunity to refute those aggravating factors which may have negatively influenced the court as held in People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 3:07 pm
The case was Ang v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
The People were permitted to call an additional witness, DD, who had been in one of defendant's classes but had moved to another State more than a year before the investigation into the present charges began. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
But under cross-examination, [he] conceded he was unsure how much time passed before Peoples entered. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 12:45 pm
CFPs:Forced Migration Review [info]- Articles sought for a theme issue on "Afghanistan’s Displaced People: 2014 and Beyond." [read post]
