Search for: "U. S. Federal Government"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 5,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
York U litigation. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
In re Murchison, 349 U. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
In post-conviction proceedings, he argued that the federal government had exclusive jurisdiction over his conduct because both he and the victim were members of the nation and the acts occurred in “Indian country. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:04 am
”– Professor Kareem U. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
’ 76 Federal Register 14, 943, 14/947 ( [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:08 am
Swift & Co., 323 U. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Thiboutot, 448 U. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) revoked a Trump-era rule that reduced the government’s ability to prosecute companies that killed federally protected migratory birds. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm
U. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:04 am
Here’s the guy who wrote the book (OK, law review article) on China and the FCPA. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
U. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:48 am
(a) Under Crawford, a witness's testimony against a defendant is inadmissible unless the witness appears at trial or, if the witness isunavailable, the defendant had a prior opportunity for crossexamination. 541 U. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:46 am
Chenery Corp., 318 U. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
U S, sending the case back to the Fourth Circuit.The Supreme Court felt the federal prosecutors had taken too broad a reading of the underlying law prohibiting “official acts” in exchange for the loans and gifts from a Virginia businessman, Jonnie Williams, who supplied the governor and his wife with $177,000 in benefits to help promote his dietary supplement, hopefully to get Virginia universities to do research on the supplement, and state employees to use… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:16 am
But the Second Circuit reads Garcetti more broadly to mean that[U]nder the First Amendment, speech can be “pursuant to” a public employee’s official job duties even though it is not required by, or included in, the employee’s job description, or in response to a request by the employer. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:42 pm
ACUS, as the Executive Branch’s administrative law “think tank” is worth watching. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
You can find a searchable version of the he IDEA statute and the federal regs at the U. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:53 am
§§ 371, 922(u), and 26 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
Washington, 541 U. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
The federal district court then indicated its agreement with the government stating that the plaintiff’s claims against the former vice president and members of Congress were “likely barred by absolute legislative immunity under the Speech or Debate clause. [read post]
