Search for: "United States v. David" Results 3661 - 3680 of 6,867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Hanni Fakhoury and Jamie Lee Williams
That’s why EFF filed a “friend of the court” brief in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
  Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 Giuliani and his fellow enabler Chris Christie have pointed out, probably correctly, that the sociopath broke no laws in zeroing out his participation in helping to finance what the United States does. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:48 am by vera
This framing results in Google being ordered to remove speech under Canadian law even if no court in the United States could issue a similar order. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
(collectively Lilly), filed suit against all defendants for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,229,382 ('382 patent). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm by Ronald Mann
Apparently putting the nail in the coffin, Justice Scalia turned the discussion to the interests of the United States as creditor – parroting the argument of the Solicitor General that approving the debtor’s plan here would prejudice the United States when it appears as a creditor – because of its general inability to advance funds to bid in a bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by Nabiha Syed
  In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough examines United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
United States, and American Needle v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am by Just Security
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh… [read post]