Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 3661 - 3680 of 4,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm by msatta
Even before the announcement of Justice Kennedy’s retirement and the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, there’s been a marked increase in anti-choice legislation and threats to Roe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am by Rory Little
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:17 pm
”  Thus, turning to the “effects” determination, the Court analyzed the Act under the seven factors articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:23 am
Here's the loophole his letter describes:With respect to treatment of detainees by the United States Government…the pertinent Amendment is the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
But most Americans now agree with Warren that the United States in the 1950s and 1960s desperately needed a levelheaded form of constitutional ethics in order to bring the legacy of Jim Crow to an end. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Breyer, seemingly accepting that the case was about release “into the United States,” used that phrase in his opinion and put it in italics, for emphasis. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Ibrahim v Kennedy. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am by Matt Sundquist
Martinez (2010); Seth Waxman and Ted Olson in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm by Ilya Somin
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:08 am by Steve Baird
Justice Kennedy stated the disparagement provision “reflects the Government’s disapproval of a subset of messages it finds offensive. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]