Search for: "Williams v. People"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2011, 10:28 am
For first offenders, many courts have attempted to go beyond what is the statutory maximum by nominally sentencing the defendant to probation but then saddling the defendant with a series of probation conditions that are rather onerous in nature.In People v John Williams, Court of Appeals No. 293553, the Court of Appeals ruled that probation could not be imposed on first offenders. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:56 pm
Chancellor William B. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
Sukur Ali v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:34 am
Williams v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
v=UL7Ct_urpUY Read more: POV - Documentaries with a point of view, IPTV, The Terrible Myth Brainy Quote, William Kunstler To read this series on the apology shield follow these links: Why Should I Apologize? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:29 pm
Just came across a letter by Ralph Ellison responding to William Faulkner's defense of a moderate, gradualist approach to Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Swerdlow, M.D., Robert V. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
Sing Sing in New York.The place where in People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
" --William Howard Taft during his time as Chief Justice (taken from Balzac v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
It was in the case of Virginia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
v=ngxZVmtKCCo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 4:24 am
Some bear a striking resemblance to Governor William J. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am
Even with this help, the data havens are still unstable: two of the three collapse in the course of the novel.Freeside: William Gibson’s Sprawl trilogy is only very tangentially about data havens. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:58 am
The decision in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Last week the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Pineda v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Joshua Fershee: One reason this decision bugs me is that I suspect a good number of people who don't like insider trading restrictions would be supportive of this decision. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Kelley v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am
See Hall v. [read post]
