Search for: "Williams v. United States" Results 3661 - 3680 of 6,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Edith Roberts
Totenberg alluded to a recent interview in which Ginsburg opined that the United States was not “experiencing the best of times. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:23 am by Doug Cornelius
Kretschmer, Walton International Group in the Blue Sky Bugle United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by Nabiha Syed
  In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough examines United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:41 pm
By Mark SpringBasics of the BillTwo United States Supreme Court Case interpretations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Sutton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:14 pm by Gregory Forman
Finally, the United States code section regarding personal jurisdiction for dividing military retirement overrides South Carolina’s long-arm statute. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Background: MITE Simultaneously with Congress’ adoption of the Williams Act, the states began adopting what are now known as first generation state takeover laws.[1] Like the Williams Act, the first generation state laws were mainly disclosure statutes. [read post]
The litigation backdrop to this decision is equivalent to the United States involvement in Afghanistan: It is a conflict with no apparent ending in sight. [read post]