Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 9:36 pm
When a visa number became available last month on the I-140, A had otherwise maintained her H-1B status by continuing to work only for X, so she was allowed to adjust her status to green card based on Y’s I-140 for her. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 9:08 pm
The second part would be, if you have the resources, get your butt to that city and call up and say, “Hey, I’m going to be there on X [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:44 am
And invariably, we will complain about the lack of features or how the program is not as intuitive, or wishing it could do x, y and z. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 6:06 am
I mean that my tasks each day are clear: read X, write Y, stuff like that. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
Under Justice Ruvolo's theory, if X, with my permission, goes and takes the car back from Y, without Y knowing that I told X it's okay, this is robbery. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Every so often I receive a request to post information on The Legal Watercooler about something that would help the person sell something that I wouldn't even buy.At other times, I have been asked by close personal friends and colleagues, including people I have only met through social networking tools, particularly Twitter, if I wouldn't mind sharing X, Y or Z information with my readers or followers because they think it would be helpful ... and they are usually right.I… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
X. challenge the Retirement Board's January of 2005 decision to retire plaintiff. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 7:53 pm
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 9:04 am
Stan Y.. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 9:21 pm
While Generations Y and X may be extremely technologically literate, most of them don't measure up to the Boomers and Traditionalists in people skills. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:12 am
"Real" rule 1 is highly problematic as a matter of equal protection (or the right to vote, or whatever), while "real" rule 2 is much less problematic because it has a legitimate justification: The people elected a Senator of Party X to a 6-year term, and until they elect a Senator of Party Y, that choice should be respected, or at least not contradicted.How can we figure out what the "real" rule is in Massachusetts? [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:42 am
U, W, X, Z), defendant fabricated documents and provided them to plaintiff as evidence that he had filed the 2001 action. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:50 pm
Vorgängig wurde im Rahmen der gegen Y., X. und weitere Personen geführten Strafuntersuchung der im Eigentum von Y. stehende Personenwagen […] beschlagnahmt […]. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
Call those X and Y. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:42 am
A logical and responsive argument might employ prior use as one element (”Czars are effective for reasons x, y, and z. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
They basically create a contingency, where a party has no obligation to perform X until condition Y occurs first. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
X et M. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:28 am
Monica Y.. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:00 pm
X and Mr. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 pm
., plaintiff held X shares of stock, and the loss was Y dollars per share, so the damages were X x Y.) [read post]
