Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 7,622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Post-termination restrictions in a nutshell - to what extent will they protect your global business?
12 Jan 2015, 11:56 am
This post was written by Michael Smith, Amy Ferrington, Séverine Martel, Marie Brunot, Jan Weißgerber, Desmond Liaw, and Anita Wan. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
” As the Supreme Court explained in Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Smith approved the ESI protocol from the FDIC and suggested the parties consider the use of predictive coding. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
We can expect further site blocking applications in 2015. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:42 am
Smith, 315 N.C. 76, 92-96 (1985) (adopting this test for the Rule 803(24) residual exception). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
In Smith and Klayman and ACLU we attacked the applicability of the outdated “third party doctrine” to NSA spying. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:08 am
Ordinarily, marks that are primarily merely surnames (such as “SMITH WINES”) cannot be registered on the Principal Register even if such names are already used as a business name or brand name and even if no one else is currently using the surname. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Smith, 58 N.J (1971).3. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
But see, Smith v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 12:26 am
” (emphasis added) While the magazine might be secured by the lacing, the Applicant might as well have taken the Smith & Wesson pistol and pointed it at its foot, inviting the USPTO to issue a functionality refusal. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm
Video, supra [warrant application requirements in obscenity cases]; People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:33 pm
Moody, 837 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1988) and Smith v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:49 am
In evaluating an applicant’s character qualifications, the Commission considers misconduct which violates the Act or a Commission rule or policy. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm
Over at the Law and Liberty Blog, there is a very interesting symposium responding to Steve Smith's essay on Meanings or Decisions? [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:46 am
When those original legal rules require us to consider outside facts, their applications will change as the facts change on the ground. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:40 am
David Smith writing on the Nearly Legal Blog has suggested an easy amendment to the wording which would do this, and hopefully the government will take this up. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Meanwhile, SOLO IP's Barbara Cookson was industrious yesterday, with posts on The Agreed Fee (here) and on the applicability of money laundering regulations to UK patent and trade mark attorney practices (here). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
The Reed Smith Health Industry Washington Watch blog has been updated to report on recent health policy developments, including the following: Legislative Developments. [read post]
