Search for: "BLACK v. STATE"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 9,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
Lauding state-sponsored historically black colleges as representing “the highest attainments of black culture,” he made clear his caution about a ruling that would endanger them. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
This contribution to our symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
This so-called “[c]ommon-defense exception,” Walton v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 8:36 pm
Now, his career is on the line.Here’s what Shapiro wrote: Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:11 am
” Black’s Law Dictionary 278 (5th ed. 1979). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:31 am
Until the passage of the Voting Rights Act, blacks in some Southern states could not vote whatsoever, due to racial terrorism and laws such as "poll taxes," which impeded political participation.The Voting Rights Act forbids policies such a poll taxes that were blatantly designed to evade the 15th Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:50 am
Supreme Court agree on the disposition of an employment law matter, but that's what happened in Lewis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:13 am
Christopher O’Shea et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
And after talking about State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:22 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada very recently noted, since R. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:25 am
The Court has heard Graham v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 2:01 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday in Van Buren v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionBrief in opposition for respondents-intervenorsAmicus brief of Former Department of Justice OfficialsAmicus brief of Cato InstituteAmicus brief of AlaskaAmicus brief of Arizona et al.Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal FoundationAmicus brief of National Black Chamber of CommerceAmicus brief of Pacific Legal FoundationReply of petitioner BG Group PLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:33 am
” The EEOC has appealed that case, captioned EEOC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:34 pm
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:26 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:25 am
Nevertheless, it is, I would suggest, of interest not just as an example of things going wrong but also for stating clearly that judges, whilst being entitled to form a view as to the credibility of witnesses, should, where essential facts are in issue, make orders on the basis of evidence rather than "on the basis of an assumption and a belief". [read post]
