Search for: "BOX v. STATE" Results 3681 - 3700 of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  For example, storing boxes of votes under a table or moving them around a tabulation center is only relevant if the votes inside those boxes were improper, which the critics do not even begin to demonstrate. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Justin P. Webb
Namely, we don't outlaw guns, even though we know they can kill people but are also used lawfully (the majority of the time); therefore, the argument goes, we can't punish makers of guns because of the potential harm they may cause - we leave the criminal consequences at the doorstep of the individual, instead - they are boxed in by the confines of the law as their state has legislated (most often) and absent just cause (e.g., the Castle Doctrine), murder is murder. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Wilcox- Precon Development Corporation v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]