Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 15,024
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Trying to nullify state capture. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Under United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:13 am
Issues relating to this FAR provision arose in a recent CBCA decision: Stobil Enterprise v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
A recent decision from the Third Circuit, Arena v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
A recent decision from the Third Circuit, Arena v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
[iii] The clinicians bring their medical expertise to bear whilst the patient (or representative) are experts in their own personhood and what is important to them. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
Plaintiffs argued that the 2012 judgement meets the other criteria and the defendant didn't dispute this point, consequently it is the party resisting recognition, the defendant, that bears the burden of establishing. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 7:55 am
A: An "inventory" search.United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 11:17 am
Marshall v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
In Moses v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
If a worker is classified as an employee, the employer bears the responsibility of paying social security and payroll taxes, unemployment insurance taxes and state employment taxes, providing worker’s compensation insurance, and of course, complying with the endless labyrinth of state and federal statutes governing the wages, hours, and working conditions of employees. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
His Honour Judge Hacon has referred to the CJEU two important questions of unregistered Community design (UCD) law.In Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v PMS International Group plc [2019] EWHC 2419 (IPEC), the Claimant (BHTB) seeks to enforce its registered Community designs, UCDs and copyright in design drawings in six soft toys called “Squeezamals” [which are seemingly very popular; readers with small children may be better placed to comment]. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:05 am
In Minton v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:40 am
In Ndiaye v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:03 pm
The California Supreme Court’s August 29, 2019 decision in Pitzer College v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:36 pm
(The leading case on this is D.C. v. [read post]
