Search for: "Christian v. State" Results 3681 - 3700 of 3,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm by Julian Ku
Christian Tams can be found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/39856262/Tams-Letter-to-Supreme-Court while the letter of Dr. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
For example, the above quoted Section from Chapter H-V 2.7 cannot be found in the Guidelines of 2009 or of 2013. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation       United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm by familoo
And indeed, what is now the complainants coercive control WAS once their very own tolerable if not ideal state of existence. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
. * * * The perpetrators of the Buffalo, El Paso, and Pittsburgh shootings—as well as other acts of racist violence—explicitly used language from the “replacement theory,” a racist and antisemitic conspiracy positing that non-whites are being brought into the United States, usually according to a Jewish-controlled plan, in order to “replace” the white and Christian population. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:55 pm by Eric Raphan and Jamie Moelis*
Specifically, the Revised Final Rule does the following: (i) reaffirms the “work-availability” requirement; (ii) reaffirms employer consent for taking FFCRA leave intermittently; (iii) revises the definition of “healthcare provider”; (iv) clarifies that employees must provide required documentation supporting their need for FFCRA leave to their employers as soon as practicable; and (v) corrects an inconsistency regarding when employees may be required to provide… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Mark claims to be a Christian, yet he wants Couey to die! [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]