Search for: "D&S, Inc." Results 3681 - 3700 of 26,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Immeubles des Moulins inc., 2021 QCCA 89Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Jacques Dufresne, Marie-Josée Hogue et Stephen W. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 1:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer’s work, experience, involvements, other publications, or programs, see www.cynthiastamer.com or contact Ms. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by admin
The article ends with Cranor’s triumphant view of Milward,[13] which he published previously, along with the plaintiffs’ lawyer who hired him.[14] What Cranor leaves out is that the First Circuit’s holding is now suspect because of the court’s uncritical acceptance of Cranor’s own misrepresentations and CERT’s omissions of conflict-of-interest disclosures, as well as the subsequent procedural history of the case. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
Section 230(c)(1) eliminates the moderator’s dilemma, the phenomenon where it may be better to not try to manage content if you are liable for any mistakes you make. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:11 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Electric Eel Manufacturing Company Inc., et al., started in 2017 with a clogged main sewer drain at the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 5:57 am
SEC Adopts Revised Investment Adviser Marketing Rule Posted by Jessica Forbes, Stacey Song, and Joanna D. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Inc. v Vigilant Insurance (discussed here) held, in reliance on the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Analysis With our hypothetical in place, let’s consider some basic analysis. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:46 am
IP Application Development LLC and Apple, Inc., 2021 USPQ2d 81 (4th Cir. 2021).The TTAB had dismissed RxD Media’s Section 2(d) opposition to Apple's registration of the mark IPAD for various business and computer services, including storage and retrieval of data. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:05 am by Jon L. Gelman
(pp. 20-22)The Court adds that Goulding would be entitled to compensation under N.J.S.A. 34:15-7’s two-part test even if her volunteer work at Family Fun Day could be deemed a recreational or social activity: her injury was sustained during an activity that (1) was a “regular incident of employment” and (2) “produce[d] a benefit to the employer beyond improvement in employee health and morale. [read post]