Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 3681 - 3700 of 4,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
Clearly, the extent to which it emerges in the course of cross-examination of a family consultant that he or she has expressed opinions or recommendations in the absence of affording a party a fair opportunity to be heard is likely to reduce, or even destroy the weight which would otherwise be given such conclusions or recommendations. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
On the parties' motions and cross motions for summary judgment, Queens County Supreme Court (Augustus C. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
That interpretation follows not only from the language of step (a), but also from the way the eight cube piece composite cube is manipulated in steps (b), (c), and (d). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by cap95
Congress since 1958: Selected Resources Compiled by Cheryl Smith Cheatham Reference Librarian/Law-Medicine Specialist The Judge Ben C. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:06 am by WSLL
However, the trial of issues separately is well accepted and W.R.Civ.P. 56(c) and (d) expressly contemplate the rendering of judgment as a matter of law on some issues and a later trial on any remaining factual issues. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:44 pm by Antitrust Today
”  In doing so, the Court observed that the Canadian subsidiary’s conduct could have helped C&D secure a monopoly in the U.S., or could otherwise shed light on the investigation. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:02 am by Russ Bensing
”   The latter statute provides that the 5-year sentence has to run consecutively “except to the extent that a greater minimum sentence is otherwise provided by [924(c) itself] or by any other provision of law. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
State law does not inform Guideline interpretation (unless Congress instructs otherwise). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]