Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 5,290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
Herring v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
This article takes the position that an approach that couples substantive rights with an expedited procedure should be adopted because it would deter SLAPP lawsuits and ensure that defendants receive adequate protection, regardless of whether the litigation involves an element of government action or not. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
Cf Schlesinger v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
(Daniels v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
Speaking on a recent edition of BBC Radio 4’s “Media Show”, Professor Roy Greenslade predicted that Lord Justice Leveson will probably recommend “some kind of statutory regulation” of the press at the end of his inquiry. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
In Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:42 pm
Here is the abstract: This is an analysis of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club Pac v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
Menendez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:02 am
First, appropriate sanctions should deter the parties from engaging in spoliation. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:57 pm
Many of you are already aware of the lengthy and colorful saga of the case of Wang v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm
’s gun regulations do not run afoul of the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:52 pm
I don’t talk to any LiP where I consider there to be a physical risk or a likelihood of verbal abuse (general rudeness is par for the course, that won’t deter). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
Contrast that with (Winter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
by Eric Goldman Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:15 am
In Ali v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:58 am
See, e.g., Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:07 am
The issue in Cox v. [read post]
