Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 3681 - 3700 of 107,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Notably, however, the statute does not expressly call-out contempt orders for violation of an injunction. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:31 pm by Kate Fort
¶29 We recognize that that does not mean that IWCA applied to the case from the date it was filed in 2011. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
"The jurisprudence is not free from difficulty or criticism, but it does not follow that better solutions are readily to hand. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:17 am
  What does the critical "subsection (a)" referenced here say, you may ask? [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals found no error with the denial of motions, but did find error in imposing conditions of probation while an appeal was pending. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 7:19 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
” The appeals court did agree with the district court that arsenic had in fact leached from the landfill and ponds into the waterways. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 7:45 am by Howard Knopf
This was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:51 am by Nathaniel F. Hansford, LLC
The court stated an employee’s mere violation or disregard of a rule does not rise to the level of willful misconduct within the meaning of the law. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:41 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: SC19203 - Tilcon Connecticut, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 10:05 am by Christopher Tyner
This post summarizes opinions issued by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 2, 2020. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:10 pm by Christopher Simon
In a frustrating decision, the Georgia Court of Appeals has ruled that the Georgia Dramshop Act , OCGA §51-1-40, does not apply to convenience stores or vendors where the alcohol will not be served on the premises. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:31 pm by Earl Drott
If the plaintiff does not meet his or her burden of proving negligence by a preponderance of the evidence, he or she will not be entitled to recover money damages. [read post]