Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 9,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2016, 5:03 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court in OPO v Rhodes ([2015] UKSC 32) shows that the tort in Wilkinson v Downton would not be available. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:34 am
Despite its potential, the outcome of Halliburton v Chubb constitutes a missed opportunity to bring the English court in line with international standards, which rarely allow for multiple appointments of arbitrators by one party or in relation to the same subject matter (absent the express consent of the parties). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Jogee corrected the historic mistake in Chan Wing-Siu [1984] UKPC 27 and R v Powell/English [1997] UKHL 57 of equating foresight with intent to assist in cases of alleged secondary participation. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
LaPorte, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
LaPorte, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:15 am
In Jubilee Motor Policies (Lloyd's Syndicate 1231) v Volvo Truck & Bus (Southern) Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 3641 (QB) the High Court was asked to strike out a claim brought by the claimant insurer, Jubilee, for a contribution under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (the Act). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
On 27 November 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in the landmark case of Halliburton v Chubb [2020] UKSC 48, which has been keenly awaited by the international arbitration community. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
Finally, this appears to be the first case in which an English court has made an award of damages against “persons unknown”. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm
This gives clarity to practitioners attempting to draft commercial agreements (for example, joint ventures) that will hold water even if a counterparty goes bust, and indeed gives welcome support to the fundamental English law principle of freedom of contract. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
See commentary to the case by Rosalind English here, and the Telegraph here. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
This is obviously sensible and is in line with the approach taken by the English law. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm
Google then sought to have that service nullified, by seeking an order declaring that the English court has no jurisdiction to try these particular claims (i.e. it was not saying that it could never be sued in the English courts). [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
" Truax v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s analogy in her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:35 am
Sefton v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
The Supreme Court has confirmed that permission has been granted to Morrisons for it to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Morrison Supermarkets PLC v Various Claimants [2018] EWCA Civ 2338. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 4:08 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
” See Oxford English Dictionary Online, www.oed.com/view/Entry/163863 (last visited Jan. 8, 2020). [read post]
