Search for: "French v. French" Results 3681 - 3700 of 5,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 2:13 pm
The three cases encompassed by today's opinion are: Google France v Louis Vuitton, Google v CNHRR and Google v Viaticum Luteceil, (Joined Cases C-236/08, C-237/08 and C-238/08). [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 10:59 am
Williams (2008), or a threat of violence against a specific person, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:53 pm
Cases reported in English for the first time are * Starbucks Corp v Photiades Foodstuff Suppliers (District Court of Nicosia, Cyprus): the ETMR's first ever report of a case from Cyprus, and quite an amazing dispute in which a powerful international company has to struggle to gain the upper hand against a resourceful and mischievous infringer whose "CHINO frappechino" coffee vending machines were ultimately held to have infringed the FRAPPUCCINO trade mark;* A v X… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The CourtMinority Language Education for Majority Students: CS Francophone du Yukon v Yukon Territory On 26 June 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) agreed to hear an appeal of Commission Scolaire Francophone du Yukon v Attorney General of the Yukon Territory, 2014 YKCA 4 [CS Francophone]. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-04-29 https://t.co/CaarCmW8l6 -> Ownership of software dispute kills development contract Tremblay-Lavigne v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
Mr Justice Lewison thought this was a jolly good idea, and it clearly sparked off some thoughts of 17th century French comedy:"In Molière's play Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme, Monsieur Jourdain asks something to be written in neither verse nor prose. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:15 am by Eleonora Rosati
A rapid response online event – free to attend – will be also held this afternoon].Today’s rulingReviewing the French version of the ruling, these seem to be the key takeaways.Preliminary remarksFirst of all, the Court addressed the very admissibility of Poland’s action. [read post]