Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 4,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 1:14 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Holder v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
" It's an electronic goods manufacturer that employs 100,000 people worldwide, including 40,000 in the United States, where it's best known for its photocopiers. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:10 am
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted through a first sale “in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:20 am
SE C.V. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP) Ireland New guidelines for dealing with extensions in time (Class 46) Malta International: Malta announces tax exemption for patent royalties (IP finance) Poland Time of bad faith in trade mark application (Class 46) South Africa World Cup 2010: Fake shirts pour in (Afro-IP) Spain Court elaborates on ‘trade mark families’ (Class 46) United Kingdom Unilever threatens legal action against BNP to prevent Marmite appearing in… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court recently said it would consider whether Costco Wholesale Corp. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Not only is it criminal, but if you're caught, the next time you marry a U.S. citizen -- even if for real this time -- you're going to find it difficult to stay in the United States.And even the Ninth Circuit isn't going to be too upset about kicking you out. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:01 am
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted through a first sale “in the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:27 pm
Eneh v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Heller – Agreed 25-Mar United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
United States; Zephier v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
Graham subsequently asked Kagan whether she agreed, and she responded that Graham and Holder had accurately stated the law. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:35 pm
In a case decided in 1942, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
The abstract appears below:The election of an African American as President of the United States has raised questions regarding the continued relevance and even constitutionality of various provisions of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
., v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
I quote:“[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
If you have a criminal conviction that has made you removable from the United States, contact an attorney to see if this new decision opens up any new options for you. [read post]
