Search for: "House of Congress Employment"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 5,072
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2011, 5:24 pm
The President’s “Jobs” speech to a joint session of Congress on September 8 was notably forceful and, I am guessing, politically adroit. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 3:26 pm
He seems oblivious that one side--or a sizable faction of one side--has deliberately attempted to damage the reputation of Congress to achieve its political objectives.... [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 3:50 pm
”That’s right, the White House (and some members of Congress) want to make it illegal to refuse to hire someone based on their current employment status, and subject employers to litigation if they are alleged to have done so. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
The Republican House Majority is again putting on its old and tired dog and pony show to blame the victims of asbestos disease for their occupational illness that were in fact caused by employers and manufactures of asbestos products. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:07 pm
But by far the biggest take-away was that Congress would start working for the people who hired them, by boosting employment. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm
Moreover, if Congress repealed health reform, as the House has voted to do, large numbers of 65- and 66-yearolds who lost Medicare coverage would likely wind up uninsured. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:10 pm
Burman is probably correct that the employer-side payroll cut is a waste of money. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:49 pm
Cheer Number One: In presenting it to a joint session of Congress, he sounded as passionate and determined as he’s ever sounded. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:24 pm
On September 6, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Majority Leader Cantor sent a letter to President Obama highlighting several House-passed jobs bills which they say "remain stalled in the Democrat-led Senate and outlining potential opportunities for Congress and the White House to work together this fall on jobs. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Congress. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
It's true that there have been some negative shocks to expected returns from the program, and that since it doesn't automatically self-adjust there will be a rising expected long-term program deficit until Congress gets around to adjusting things. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:46 pm
Title 18, Section 713 regulates the use of likenesses of the great seal of the United States, the seals of the President and Vice President, the seal of the United States Senate, the seal of the United States House of Representatives, and the seal of the United States Congress. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Employers aren’t hiring either. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
Both employees and employers are insufficiently educated on their rights and obligations in terms of wage discrimination. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:38 am
We need a bold and effective action plan for employment. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:15 pm
Gaining approval of a spending program involves navigating four committees (the committee with subject matter jurisdiction in each house, along with the appropriations committee in each house), whereas a "tax cut" requires approval from only two committees (Ways and Means in the House, and Finance in the Senate). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:38 am
Blount with the blog faculty Source – The White House: The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release August 31, 2011 Remarks by the President on Transportation Bill and FAA Bill Extension Rose Garden Note the corrected name of the employer of the individuals mentioned below: *Adam Vencill and Chris Negley, KCI Technologies **Hector Sealey and Austin Anderson, Ft. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:39 pm
” Currently before the House Committee on Financial Services, the bill would require whistleblowers to first report fraud internally to their employers. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Let the White House ignore it and Republicans scorn it. [read post]
