Search for: "House v. State"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 25,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2025, 2:32 pm
EO N-4-25 will likely be at odds with recent case law that sets the requirements for analyzing a project’s impacts on evacuation routes and wildfire risk, including People of the State of California ex rel Rob Bonta Attorney General v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:47 pm
., justifies vacation of lengthy sentence: United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:55 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
Pelipenko v Russia 16/1/14 We reported the ECtHR’s decision on the merits here. [read post]
Massachusetts Land Court Finds Property Owners Have Standing to Challenge Neighbor’s Zoning Variance
21 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
The Massachusetts Land Court released a recent decision in the case of Holmes v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:42 am
Delo and House v. [read post]
8 Apr 2006, 1:06 am
A comment in IPKat has a link to the ruling for Baigent v Random House [2006] EWHC 719 (Ch). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
This bolsters the constitutionality of the House bill, because, as the Supreme Court said in Marsh v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
(…) In the meantime, Heller filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 8:36 am
On 14 September 2010, in Case C-550/07 P, Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 10:43 am
Anderson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:08 pm
” In coming to this view, Bromberg J considered, but ultimately decided not to follow, a number of earlier decisions of the High Court and the NSW Court of Appeal (Neale v Atlas Products (Victoria) Pty Ltd (1955) 94 CLR 419; World Book (Australia) Pty Ltd v Commission of Taxation (1992) 27 NSWLR 377; Vabu Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 81 IR 150)) which dealt with the meaning of “contract that is wholly or principally for the labour” of… [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
An opinion was issued stating that the use is not permitted. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
