Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 7,539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Code § 3110, states that a public official may not appoint a relative to a position in the agency in which the official is serving. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
At the end of that process, you can be sure that the written statement you receive represents their official position and that your communication is directly involved in the decision-making process. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
If that’s true, and Charlie is a public figure or public official, then Alan is off the hook. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:07 am
And it’s not like they’re really rare, especially not on Long Island. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
Since there is little doubt that the Ministers and their officials will be heavily lobbied by the usual suspects, it would be logical for the Ministers to open up the process by inviting submissions and, perhaps, holding public fora either online or in person or both, as has been done in the past. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
Since there is little doubt that the Ministers and their officials will be heavily lobbied by the usual suspects, it would be logical for the Ministers to open up the process by inviting submissions and, perhaps, holding public fora either online or in person or both, as has been done in the past. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
According to an official Minnesota State Bar Association publication, Gruender “knocked his father to the floor before his 12-year-old brother could be shot. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
As Secretary of State, Hillary used a personal email server for official government correspondence. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
Erwin decision, and then Congress changed it. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
The couple live outside Ann Arbor with their two children, who attend public schools. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
We conclude the warrantless search of defendant Macabeo’s phone would not have been proper even under our decision in Diaz, and a reasonably well-trained officer would have so known. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:35 am
The decision about who is released and who is detained before trial is determined primarily by a person's financial resources rather than his or her risk to public safety or likelihood to return to court. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:08 am
And besides, the official channels lack the depth of empathy that a woman on campus needs. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
Annual Re-Certification of CFTC Exemptions. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:53 am
Tenth Circuit (over a dissent): They’re officers. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:19 am
The investigations costing the taxpayer £43.7 million resulted in just 8 convictions for phone hacking (Operation Weeting) and 2 convictions for paying public officials (Operation Elveden). [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 7:47 am
Like what you're reading? [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
The decision is a welcome departure from a body of case law that usually defers to the government’s perception of “special needs” that supposedly justify analyzing people’s bodily fluids without a warrant or any evidence that they pose a threat to public safety. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Government officials admitted that the memorandum was repeatedly marked as “attorney-client privilege,” but produced it anyway and said it could re-assert the privilege later. [read post]
