Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones" Results 3681 - 3700 of 6,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2019, 6:15 am by Bob Ambrogi
Jones, the court held that widget manufacturers are liable when … “ Start with why it matters. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Customers included Man Group Plc (EMG), the world’s biggest hedge fund; Tudor Investment Corp., Tudor Jones’s hedge fund; and Saudi Arabian financial-services firm Saad Group, according to the people familiar with the matter. [read post]
That means that anything that is a matter of policy—no matter how much one might disagree with the policy or how abhorrent one might find it—should not be included. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Kristina Lorch, John Sullivan Baker
Jones, a subsequent Supreme Court case that held that “immunities are grounded in ‘the nature of the function performed, not the identity of the actor who performed it,’” is inapplicable because it involved pre-presidency actions. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
  As to the latter, the judge found that `there is a record made on the computer that John Jones has sent Mary Smith a message on a particular day. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
Jones: The Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of credit towards Mr. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 2:15 pm
Jones & Co., 324 F.3d 1346, 1352 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Finance, Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) [Historical], https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EDJI/history. [5] Others have of course noted the danger that opinions might be lumped together with true false statements of fact. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:37 pm
You can check out some of their representative matters here. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm by Ilya Somin
In the 1982 Bob Jones case, the Reagan administration refused to defend an IRS policy denying tax exemptions to a university that practiced racial segregation for religious reasons. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
Office of Personnel Management, which provides material to educate and train federal employees on the Constitution and other matters, were not returned. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Doug Jasinski
” Answer 4: Keep Up With (Okay, Beat) the Jones & Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
Resolving this conundrum once and for all would have been an attractive reason for the Supreme Court to hear this matter. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:06 pm
 Liability Issues:  The use of armed personnel while at sea might give rise to Jones Act negligence for failure to provide a "reasonably safe place to work" or numerous other bases for findings of negligence by the employer in personam. [read post]