Search for: "JOHN DOE #1, an individual"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 5,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
He notes that he has been involved in the American Civil Liberties Union’s John Adams Project. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
(2) Does 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:12 am
One only has to remember the fear and loathing that greeted news of the first “test tube baby” in this country to remind oneself of the pace of developments in this field (in 1978 Pope John Paul 1 expressed concerns about the possibility that artificial in [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Explicitly does not address franchise, income, occupation, or other taxes. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:31 am
Why that sure does make one feel happy does it not? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:50 am
· Under Section 13401.5(a) of the Moscone-Knox Professional Corporation Act, certain enumerated, licensed health care professionals other than physicians may be “shareholders, officers, directors, or professional employees” of the professional medical corporation, so long as the sum of shares these non-physician, licensed professionals own does not exceed 49% of the total. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:05 am
It says he went 3 1/2 [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
” Pollard’s attorney, John F. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:17 am
By John H.W. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Every judicial candidate says they want to be “fair” and “unbiased,” but unless you know them personally (or know someone who does) the only real information we have to go on is their professional experience. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
John C. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
Check whether the individual person and business entity are properly licensed (see Questions 26 to 38). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
1) A. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:55 pm
John Fund, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Unlike these other statutes, § 2259 does not explicitly require a “direct” or “proximate” harm to the individual for that individual to qualify for restitution; rather, according to the statute’s plain language, any harm resulting from a qualifying offense is sufficient. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
In In re Michael, the defendant allegedly raped an 8 year-old and claimed that the trial court erred by precluding him from presenting witness testimony and Children Services records indicating that other individuals had sexually abused the alleged victim. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Sutton offers these well-documented psychological forces to explain such inaccurate reconstruction of people’s emotions: (1) a Pollyanna effect, (2) editing of memories to maintain cognitive consistency, and (3) pressures of social norms in reconstructing past feelings. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:59 pm
John Does 1-27(Case No. 1:11-cv-07627), filed October 27 in the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Johns and Melva Enos (forthcoming) Petitioner’s reply Hardy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
G., she actually does have her own television show where the cutting edge in forensic science is shared. [read post]
