Search for: "JONES v. THE STATE"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 6,130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Yesterday’s second grant, in Lozman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
It is also possible that the Trump administration (which is no fan of Obamacare) will choose not to defend the constitutionality of the mandate, in which case the court might appoint an independent lawyer to defend the statute (as it did in the 1982 Bob Jones case) or allow blue states to step in to defend (as lawyers hired by mostly Republican members Congress were allowed to step in to defend a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Obama administration refused to… [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Ed. 2d 876, 889 (1990); Jones v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
Jones v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
Earlier this week, the Washington Court of Appeals applied this analysis in Dunlap v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm
In People v Lester (N.Y. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Key US Supreme Court decisions, such as Jones v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 3:55 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (District Court), in the case styled National Small Business Association v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Here is a link to the Court's opinion in Merchant v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
" Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion in the case, CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:46 am
Reuters and the Wall Street Journal /Dow Jones also reported the story. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:49 am
Archis Parasharami and Dan Jones make a similar point here. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 7:50 am
Jones is particularly instructive. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am
The Supreme Court first confronted the use of devices to monitor vehiclular movment in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
By Mike Dorf No doubt many casual observers were stunned by the fact that today's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
On November 9, 2007, the appellant filed a successive motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Fl.R.Cr.P. 3.851(e)(2) based on "new evidence truly demonstrating that Schwab could not control his conduct" which, under Jones v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
On November 9, 2007, the appellant filed a successive motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Fl.R.Cr.P. 3.851(e)(2) based on "new evidence truly demonstrating that Schwab could not control his conduct" which, under Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:02 am
One case of particular interest is the 1993 case of Jones v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am
News Corp Australia’s Alan Jones recent moves has drawn the comment from the Guardian [£] with the newspaper being drawn comments from the reaction to the decision to no longer publish Jones’ column in the Daily Telegraph. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the applicant had failed to include this claim in his application: the Court clarified that failure to state a claim in the application cannot be compensated by introducing the claim at the hearing (unless the plea is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure), as stated by Article 48(2) of the Rules of procedure of the General Court and held in previous case law (Case T‑246/06, Redcats SA v OHIM). [read post]
