Search for: "John Doe C" Results 3681 - 3700 of 5,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by Shahram Miri
Since the deed requires a notarized signature, John will need to submit proof to the notary that he is John Baker when he signs the deed. 2. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:07 am by Heidi Henson
What the OFCCP’s proposal does, Norris maintained, is to “feature” an individual’s disability. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:32 am by Andrew Trask
More importantly, Dean Klonoff does not address the actual new requirement imposed by Rule 23(c)(1)(B), which requires a detailed order from courts certifying a class. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
  bit.ly/HzXpGZ (Joshua Engel) Communications with Unretained Experts, Unprotected by Rule 26(b)(B)(4)(C) – Any Exceptions? [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:06 am by CAPTAIN
Judge Teretha Thomas Lundy has an opponent; (John Rodriguez). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am by SHG
Frankly, only a silly c*nt would think so. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 5:13 am by Gary L. Francione
Dawkins notes that, in contrast to deontologists, “[c]onsequentialists more pragmatically hold that the morality of an action should be judged by its consequences,” and he contrasts the “absolutist” with the “consequentialist or utilitarian” who has greater flexibility to consider moral issues. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rogers is not an impermissible “blanket rule,” though it does apply to an entire sector of the market. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
This is a question the Court of Appeal considered in its recent judgment in James Butler v John Smith. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Andy Dorchak
Stat., ch. 725, 5/103-1(c): “(c) No person arrested for a traffic, regulatory or misdemeanor offense, except in cases involving weapons or a controlled substance, shall be strip searched unless there is reasonable belief that the individual is concealing a weapon or controlled substance. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am by Matthew Bush
CaliforniaDocket: 11-775Issue(s): Whether California’s rule – that the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial does not apply when a defendant is charged by complaint and arrested and arraigned on the complaint but does apply if the defendant is indicted or held to answer on an information – should be overruled.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Cal. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
Unlike weak Pareto, strong Pareto does permit some relatively robust conclusions. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:16 am by William McGrath
The Commission seeks entry of a Judgment "ordering each Defendant to reimburse ArthroCare for all SOX 304 compensation and profits realized from his sales of ArthroCare stock during the relevant statutory time periods," but does not identify that amount. [read post]