Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 3681 - 3700 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia -- joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan -- delivered a full-throated defense of violent video games, holding, "Crudely violent video games, tawdry TV shows, and cheap novels and magazines are no less forms of speech than The Divine Comedy, and restrictions upon them must survive strict scrutiny. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am by appealattorneylaw
” Justice Thomas delivered the majority opinion of the Court, and was joined by the other conservative members of the Court, Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, and Sotomayor. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:54 pm
  I am not sure whether I was more mystified by the position of CJ Roberts (joined in this portion of his opinion by Justices Breyer and Kagan) or horrified by the joint opinion (of Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:48 am by Salomon Laguerre
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy, wrote that “[i]f a pregnant woman is denied an accommodation under a policy that does not discriminate against pregnancy, she has been ‘treated the same’ as everyone else” (emphasis in the original). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:02 am by Krekor
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
8 May 2009, 7:01 pm by lawhumorist
 And besides, it’s not like any justice other than Kennedy has a say in the outcome of these cases anyway. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:06 am by Bill Ward
Monmouth County Assignment Judge Lawrence Lawson wisely placed the mediation process in the hands of Superior Court Judge Thomas W. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:14 am by Eric Turkewitz
The line-up at the time looked like this on SCOTUS — and it’s tough to miss the homogenous nature of the Harvard/Yale lineup: Chief Judge John Roberts: Harvard Law School Antonin Scalia:  Harvard Law School Anthony Kennedy:   Harvard Law School Clarence Thomas: Yale Law School Ruth Bader Ginsburg:  Harvard Law School Stephen Breyer: Harvard Law School Samuel Alito: Yale Law School Sonia Sotomayor: Yale Law School Elena Kagan: Harvard Law School But it… [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am by Matt Sundquist
" Teachout suggests that Justice Kennedy, in an effort to form a technical, logical argument, missed the reality of how politics work. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:03 pm
The Chief Justice and Justices Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Souter, Ginsburg, and Alito moved on to discuss the history of the statute and how that further clarified the meaning of the clause. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily, Jordan Rubin at Bloomberg BNA, and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, who reports that “[i]n concurrence, Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the main holding but was a lone voice announcing scepticism about the long-standing ‘exclusionary rule’ that suppresses illegally grabbed evidence. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that “[f]or those who expect Justice Kennedy to be a savior here—or in the Gill partisan gerrymandering case (where he also voted with the Court to stop an interim remedy in Wisconsin pending Supreme Court resolution)—this is one data point against that hope. [read post]