Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 3681 - 3700 of 20,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by JD Hull
And remember, those callers and inquirers are clients (even if just temporarily) the moment they disclose facts about the matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Its corollary is that the state must remain neutral in matters involving this freedom. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:26 pm
P. 26(b)(5)(B).[( c ) Selective waiver. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:15 am by Genevieve P. Rapadas
’” The dissent argued that “[t]he Court’s emphasis on differences between class members mimics the Rule 23(b)(3) inquiry into whether common questions ‘predominate’ over individual issues. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:53 pm by Joseph Fishkin
 (We will not get this one—don’t get your hopes up.) [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:26 pm
Plus a warning -- significant in this case, and to which all the judges agree -- that you can't move for a post-trial judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) if you haven't first made a similar motion at the close of the evidence under Rule 50(a). [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 11:25 am
It's unoriginal as a matter of law. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:22 am
So if the statute doesn't work -- the statute doesn't work, and the Secretary's interpretation of 1415(i)(2)(B)(iii) is implausible because it accords to hearing officers the authority that it doesn't have... [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Gov’t filed its motion to dismiss — arguing that the patents are all invalid as a matter of law under Section 101. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am by Jonathan Holbrook
If the matter had occurred as alleged, there would be evidence of it somewhere in these records; but there isn’t any, and therefore we can conclude that the matter never happened. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Elton John’s “Nikita”: affirmed 12(b)(6) dismissal. [read post]