Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 4,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (Managing IP) (TorrentFreak) Google v China (Ars Technica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) (China Law Blog) (IP Dragon) (China Hearsay) (China Hearsay) (China Hearsay) Global Global - Copyright Video of Google DC ACTA debate posted online (Michael Geist) Music Biz: piracy our ‘climate change’, governments must act! [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:03 am
Murphy Oil USA and Connecticut v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
” Public Utilities Comm’n. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
High School Musical star files copyright lawsuit (IP Whiteboard) MGA Entertainment - It’s not over for MGA’s Bratz Doll line yet – 9th Circuit recently stayed injunction requiring MGA to ensure Bratz dolls no longer on store shelves (IP Law Blog) US Trade Marks Tricky Joseph Abboud naming and branding setting trademark law precedents (Name Wire) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC: Trade dress registration rejected out of habit: The Foundation for a… [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:20 pm
Plus Products v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 3:57 am
"why do we need the state’s permission to get married anyway? [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
Nueva Generacion Music Group, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court C D California: BitTorrent site liable for Grokster style inducement of copyright infringement: Columbia Pictures v Fung (Internet law - Internet Cases) District Court N D California rejects RealNetworks’ claim that movie studios were colluding against it (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps EMI - EMI attacks NirGaga mashup (Electronic Frontier Foundation)… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
—together controlled over 80 percent of digital music sold to end purchasers in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:03 am
Before Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:30 pm
” The court found that the plaintiffs had not stated breach of warranty claims because, although an iPod -- designed to be used with earphones as well as external speaker systems -- is capable of playing loud music for hours on end, that only means that users can choose to take risks with their hearing, not that the iPod was lacking in quality. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:27 am
See Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:28 pm
(Owens v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:12 am
In Hovespian v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am
At least one major online music service will begin to offer music in a lossless format. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:59 am
” Birdsong v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:29 am
General Electric Company v. [read post]
