Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3681 - 3700
of 21,685
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
However, in APL Microscopic, LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:07 am
” People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 6:24 am
Mason, 59 M.J. 416, 422 (C.A.A.F. 2004) (emphasis omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
In 2019, the Seventh Circuit decided Rickey Kanter v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm
The result was a marked shift in direction. [read post]
SCOTUS Asked to Resolve Circuit Split Over U.S. Discovery in Foreign Private Commercial Arbitrations
23 Dec 2020, 6:13 am
Photo by: John-Mark Smith on Unsplash [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:11 am
On December 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Adaptive Streaming Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:54 pm
Franchisee Ass’n-USA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Title II – Assistance to Individuals, Families, and Businesses Foley Title II Contacts: Carrie Hoffman, Mark Neuberger, Jacqueline Hayduk, Michael Abbott, Tim Voigtman Subtitle A – Unemployment Insurance; Chapter 1 – Continued Assistance to Unemployed Workers Subchapter I – Extension of CARES Act Unemployment Provisions. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
In Ozgur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
In Ozgur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
In Ozgur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
This sentiment was expressed in our decision in Shepp v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:53 am
by Dennis Crouch The Boeing Company v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
His controlling opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Relying on French case law, the court held that there is no infringement of trade mark rights when a first name is added to a surname already registered as a trade mark, provided that there is no state of confusion in the minds of the public be it visually, phonetically or orally. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
