Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 3681 - 3700
of 16,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
The short answer is it doesn't really. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am
We don’t deny the equitable appeal of the impossibility argument. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 6:41 am
Click here for the story, from the Journal’s Mark Maremont. [read post]
26 May 2017, 5:21 am
And one that didn’t pay off for Comcast’s vendor. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:00 am
Ing In Forma Pauperis – Colorado Springs Bankruptcy Attorney, Bob Doig Insiders – Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney, Mark J. [read post]
22 May 2011, 1:25 pm
Your satisfaction matters to us and we hope that you'll take a couple minutes to help us in our quest for excellence in service. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:10 pm
“It doesn’t mean enforcement isn’t going to happen, but we would like to be more proactive,” Yamane said. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:38 am
The SCOTUS decision could settle the matter with some finality, allowing workers to know where they stand. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:34 am
” Each of these amendments would, as a practical matter, eliminate any barrier to the president imposing the deal immediately and unilaterally. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:12 am
“It doesn’t matter which flu vaccine you get, just get one,” advised Dr. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 3:18 am
Believe what you want, no matter how foolish or wrong it may be. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
” and “don’t you know me at all / I don’t mark stuff up / stay as conservative as possible. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:45 am
It doesn’t matter who the owner is because the question is whether anyone is confused and clearly, here, no one would be. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 4:07 am
The matter shown in broken lines is not part of the mark. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:44 am
But at the same time, I think he misses the mark with some of his statements, and focuses on the wrong aspects of copying in making his case for why he feels ripped off. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
Stevenson also referenced Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v Boutiques Cliquot Lige (2006 SCC 23) at paragraph 20 where Justice Binnie articulated that: “[t]he test to be applied is a matter of first impression in the mind of a casual consumer somewhat in a hurry who sees the name… and does not pause to give the matter any detailed consideration or scrutiny, nor to examine closely the similarities and differences between the marks. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
Why shouldn't he? [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
It was a horrible crime, the details of which don't much matter here. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 7:54 am
What mattered more was the reality of the job. [read post]
