Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 3681 - 3700 of 16,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm by Bona Law PC
The opinion is significant not because it marks a departure in the prevailing law, but because it explains it so well. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:31 am by Aron Laszlo (Oppenheim Legal)
In Shaggy’s 2000 hit, the main character is caught cheating on his girlfriend and defends himself by simply denying the facts and repeating the phrase: “It wasn’t me! [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 11:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
I don’t know anyone who didn’t like Perry and I can’t imagine that there is anyone who didn’t like Perry. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by AprilPerson
It does not matter if you feel all right and don’t have visible severe injuries or no injuries at all. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
(f) trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of moralitySubsequently, also the EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal and the General Court (T‑69/17) upheld the initial EUIPO decision. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
According to the court, while the article contained inappropriate statements, it concerned a matter of public interest and fell “within the area where the freedom of the press should be protected in a democratic society. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
The term "undue hardship" makes clear "that this is a field of degrees, not a matter for extremes" or "absolutes. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:32 am by Diane Tweedlie
"After this discussion the Board deliberated and subsequently informed the parties of its view that the subject-matter of claim 1 did not involve an inventive step.In the Facts and Submissions part of the written decision (see p.10) the comments from the petitioner with respect to D46 are summarized. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
This means that the movant must demonstrate that there are no genuine and material fact disputes and that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am by Preston Lim
In its appeal, Nevsun argued that the plaintiffs’ claims should be struck without consideration of the merits, on the basis that (a) the act of state doctrine applied, such that Canadian courts lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over any of the plaintiffs’ claims, and (b) there existed no separate cause of action in Canadian tort law for breaches of customary international law. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:06 am by Mark Weidemaier
That would be bizarre, as the difference wouldn't matter unless the meeting were poorly-attended. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The takeaway for Ontario employers is thus that the amount an employee may argue that he or she is entitled to is more of a “high water mark” than a black-and-white demand. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am by Sophie Corke
She explained that this goes to the heart of the matter: when and how do we assess what is ‘not obvious to a person skilled in the art, having regard to any matter which forms part of the state of the art’? [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm by INFORRM
” If the Supreme Court agree with the Appellants, that would be a marked shift in the operation of the section 4 public interest defence, potentially enabling major publishers to justify avoiding pre-publication enquiries. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm by Robert Chesney, Eric Talbot Jensen
Ney says, “Legal analysis isn’t that different whether you’re a law school student or the DoD General Counsel: you start with the facts. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Questions marked in red are those that we consider to be of most interest to petitioners. [read post]