Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3681 - 3700 of 4,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 6:34 am by Ray Dowd
Image from http://www.ivi.tv/ viewed 3/13/2010In WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc. 10 Civ. 715(SDNY Feb 22, 2010), Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald granted a preliminary injunction under the Second Circuit's standard set forth in Salinger v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 6:21 am by Howard Wasserman
" Thus, plausibility is required, but the complaint need not lay out its complete legal theory with detail or precision. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
The scope of a defendant's consent is judged according to a standard of objective reasonableness. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Our post the other day on Wolicki-Gables v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Section 232B was designed to cater for precisely that kind of case. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In the early years after New York Times, several justices (lead by Justice Brennan) pushed toward having the actual malice standard depend on speech being on matters of public concern, an effort that ended in Gertz v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Here are some preliminary observations on the opinions in Michigan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Courts Struggle with Realities of Post Grant Practice A standard component of any patent litigation is a protective order. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm by Marc DeGirolami
Admittedly, I haven't been able to articulate a standard, a precise theory that we can use to distinguish neatly when a defendant acts with depravity and when he does not. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Chief did most of it and starts us off.] [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Chief did most of it and starts us off.] [read post]