Search for: "People v. Herring"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 23,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2012, 9:34 am
Can't people choose to volunteer to do work? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
” Case citation: Clark v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:18 am
I guess he thinks that the laws apply to other people, but not to him.Second, while Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
Her claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and Title VII were dismissed without prejudice (Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 2:59 pm
It seems everyone has put forth their opinion on the impact of Herring v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:15 am
The court made it clear in Packington v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:45 am
" Laird v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
American Public Health Association et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
In November 2006 McGovern J. ruled in the High Court that Ireland's constitutional protection of "the unborn" does not include embryos outside the womb.The full decision is now available on BAILII:M.R. v T.R. and Others [2006] IEHC 359 (15 November 2006)www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2006/H359.htmlThe earlier High Court case wasM.R. v T.R. [2006] IEHC 221 (18 July 2006)[tinyurl.com]Sample News Story:Legislation prospect after embryo… [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:06 am
Some people might consider that phrase an oxymoron; I don’t. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:09 am
Police officers’ conduct is also unlikely to be affected, as anyone even arguably acting under color of law will not have to pay a judgment out of his or her own pocket.The AVMA likewise mixes apples and oranges by arguing that permitting non-economic damages will elevate human-animal relationships above some human-human relationships. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 3:33 am
Additional Resources: Allen v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 3:33 am
Additional Resources: Allen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
