Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 5,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 7:18 pm
(See People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:27 pm
byJill Paperno, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn a very important decision People v Fisher (2012 NY Slip Op 02416 [4/3/12]) the Court of Appeals, by a 6-1 vote, reversed convictions for various sex offenses and ordered a new trial upon a finding that the defendant's trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the prosecutor's summation was egregiously improper and there was no evident strategic basis for… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
I specifically address the claims that officer juries are insufficiently independent to render fair verdicts. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:18 am
I recently wrote a piece for Michigan Law Review’s online journal about why United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
But should comment be as legally free on people’s private lives? [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Section 2 of the Dan Ray Warren v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
Justice T.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:56 am
The insurers firstly argued that the legislation breached their Article 1 Protocol 1 property rights contrary to s.29(2)(d) of the Scotland Act, by rendering their money liable to expropriation by claimants. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:01 am
You should also make the information available to the people of your organization. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
I taught Bowsher v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:39 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Sebelius and Florida v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Sebelius and Florida v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:07 am
Kolyadenko v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am
In a potentially significant move, the court accepted plaintiffs’ argument that there’s no difference between a law that bars promotional speech and one that renders a product’s sale illegal based on speech used to promote it. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:17 pm
Doctors and hospitals could exclude people from consuming health care without paying, simply by refusing to provide services. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
Unfortunately, though, that is what happened to our client in People v. [read post]
