Search for: "Read v. United States"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 30,126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 5:19 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:02 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
At oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:44 am
Bus. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:44 am
Bus. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:23 am
United States, the defendant is requesting that the United States Supreme Court grant certiorari in his case, to address the issue of when an individual can be seized for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
This December the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided a significant case interpreting the false marking provision of United States Patent Law. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:56 am
United States District Court Judge Shira A. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:23 am
United States, the defendant is requesting that the United States Supreme Court grant certiorari in his case, to address the issue of when an individual can be seized for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 1:52 pm
You know the Supreme Court of the United States feels strongly about an issue when, in the Court’s parlance, it adds “extra icing on a cake already frosted. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 7:28 am
In June 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued an important decision in a case called Connelly v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:29 pm
Trades Council v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm
The EPA and Department of the Army announced a final rule amending the definition of protected “waters of the United States” in light of the decision in Sackett v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that: Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that: Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
