Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 3681 - 3700 of 6,810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
In today’s case (Bell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:34 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal panel comprised of the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, ( who was was in the Court of Appeal in Douglas v Hello!) [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Huge “rolled the dice and chose not to pursue additional discovery at the outset . . . . [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Michael Semler weighs in on Liu v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
27 May 2020, 11:42 am by Giles Peaker
This would not extend to appeals in the Supreme Court They would not, however, be competent to stay an ongoing appeal to the Supreme Court, not because of the words used, but because such appeals are beyond the jurisdiction of the Master of the Rolls in making Practice Directions under CPR Part 51.2. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Matt Danzer
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:29 am by Ronald Mann
But that is where we are with GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA, set for argument next Tuesday. [read post]