Search for: "Rolling v. State" Results 3681 - 3700 of 4,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
How many extra voters would be added to the rolls in Texas if incarcerated people were allowed to vote? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls, gave the judgment of the court, and effectively overturned the Hildebrand principle, stating: It follows that nothing in the so-called Hildebrand rules can be relied upon in justification of, or as providing a defence to, conduct which would otherwise be criminal or actionable (whether as a tort or in equity) nor as providing any reason why the relief (whether at law or in equity) which would otherwise be available should not be granted. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Adam Chandler
Meanwhile, Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr reports that Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
The State also comes out the winner in the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
The Master of the Rolls in the sole judgment found that although this was a superficially attractive argument based on those two terms of s.89 alone, and would produce an attractive result in view of Ms H's situation, one had to consider the broader statutory context of Housing Act 1985. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
The Master of the Rolls in the sole judgment found that although this was a superficially attractive argument based on those two terms of s.89 alone, and would produce an attractive result in view of Ms H's situation, one had to consider the broader statutory context of Housing Act 1985. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:40 pm by Keith Rizzardi
  Also, earlier this year in a 9th Circuit decision, Palouse Prairie Foundation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
Permission to appeal was sought from the Court of Appeal and this was heard at the same time as the appeal itself before the Master of the Rolls (with LJ Arden and LJ Stanley Burnton) who gave the leading decision. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
Permission to appeal was sought from the Court of Appeal and this was heard at the same time as the appeal itself before the Master of the Rolls (with LJ Arden and LJ Stanley Burnton) who gave the leading decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:51 am by Erin Miller
In response to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Adam Wagner
The judge stated clearly that the Al Rawi principles applied in the current case. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by Lawrence Koplow
The Arizona Supreme Court Case recently attempted to end the debate in the case of State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:33 am by uwlegalscholarship
The Akron Law Review will review articles on a rolling basis until Oct. 15, 2010. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 7:55 am by Matt Brown
The Supreme Court of Arizona is no doubt aware of the arguments I’ve made, and it clearly acknowledged the fact that rules need remedies in State v. [read post]