Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY" Results 3681 - 3700 of 9,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2025, 5:04 pm by Jon L. Gelman
   The court, however, determined that the facts presented did not satisfy the stringent test for establishing an intentional wrong as defined by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Millison v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:30 am by Uzoamaka N. Okoye
On October 29, 2012, as Hurricane Sandy began its assault on the State, a New Jersey Appellate Court in New Jersey Schools Development Authority v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:41 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In this case, the net proceeds of the estate would escheat to the State of New Jersey.2. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 12:42 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
In this case, the net proceeds of the estate would escheat to the State of New Jersey.2. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:40 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In this case, the net proceeds of the estate would escheat to the State of New Jersey.2. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:30 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In this case, the net proceeds of the estate would escheat to the State of New Jersey.2. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 7:35 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Lawyer and a Fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys, Eric is resident in Fox Rothschild’s Roseland and Morristown, New Jersey offices, though he practices throughout New Jersey. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
Anyone riding as a passenger or in a trailer under the age of 12 must wear a helmet as well.New Jersey LawIn New Jersey, state law requires that anyone under the age of 17 that rides a bicycle must wear a safety helmet. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
And of course this New Jersey precedent is likely to be cited to and by other state courts in the future. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:54 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
A recent age discrimination case from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is a helpful reminder that just because your employer has a good excuse for its decision to fire you, it does not necessarily mean the company did not violate the law. [read post]