Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 3681 - 3700 of 41,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
The FPF Report mentions that the EDPB recommends the harmonization of procedural aspects of GDPR enforcement, with a focus on “the (i) status and rights of the parties to the administrative procedures, (ii) procedural deadlines, (iii) requirements for admissibility or dismissal of complaints, (iv) investigative powers of SAs, and (v) the overall implementation of the cooperation procedure”. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Crusto (Loyola University New Orleans College of Law) has posted Blackness as State Property: Valuing Critical Race Theory (57 Harv. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:19 am by Leonardo A. Di Stasio
In an opinion issued on February 8, 2023, the New Jersey Appellate Division carved out an exception to the New Jersey Supreme Court’s requirement in Atalese v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:19 am by Leonardo A. Di Stasio
In an opinion issued on February 8, 2023, the New Jersey Appellate Division carved out an exception to the New Jersey Supreme Court’s requirement in Atalese v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:19 am by Leonardo A. Di Stasio
In an opinion issued on February 8, 2023, the New Jersey Appellate Division carved out an exception to the New Jersey Supreme Court’s requirement in Atalese v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am by CMS
It also stated that there is no valid chain of title from DABUS to the Appellant. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
That said, insofar as the Clause is designed to protect members of Congress from the Executive’s “power to harass” them through use of law enforcement authorities, that separation-of-powers concern would scarcely if ever apply to the Executive’s turning such power against its own Vice President. [read post]