Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 4,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
A silver medal goes to Michael's post on DeJohn v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 4:30 am
It has in the past.Fifty years ago, in Flora v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:59 pm
In one case, Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:30 pm
It claimed those practices violated the separation of church and state. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
The majority opinion stated that neither President Bush nor Gov. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
The majority opinion stated that neither President Bush nor Gov. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
Bush asked them not to do it, they still killed Medellin. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:44 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:12 pm
The military first attempted to prosecute him under a system set up by President Bush, but the Supreme Court struck that down in 2006 (Hamdan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:53 am
Solicitor General and the state of Louisiana, to reopen its decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:07 am
See Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
Summary: On July 30, 2008, President Bush signed into law H.R. 3221, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (the "Act"). [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 9:20 pm
Ruling on August 4 in DeJohn v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
This inaction is consistent with the United States’ decision in 2005 to withdraw the Untied States’ accession to jurisdiction of the [World Court] with regard to matters arising under the Convention. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:42 am
Obviously the Bush administration isn't going to do this.It's clear that the Chamber is worried about an EPA in the post-Bush era. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:03 am
President Bush had issued a Memorandum to the Attorney General directing thatstate courts give effect to the Avena judgment. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 7:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:27 pm
It also ruled that President Bush did not have the authority on his own to order Texas or any other state to comply with the World Court ruling and give foreign nationals a new chance to challenge their conviction and sentences. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:18 pm
Nixon was decided, the courts have routinely considered questions of executive privilege or immunity, and those issues are now "of a type that are traditionally justiciable" in federal courts, United States v. [read post]
