Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 3681 - 3700 of 6,090
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2012, 10:57 am by Shahram Miri
Goad v Moulton (1885) 67 C 536.So in the case of a gift deed, the above language need not be included on the deed. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm by Elizabeth Lauderback
§ 512.[4] Viacom Int’l Inc., v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
The term does not include: (I) A person selling or trading secondhand property so long as such property was not originally purchased for resale and so long as such person does not sell or trade secondhand property more than five weekend periods in any one calendar year, as verified by a declaration to be prepared by the seller. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
The term does not include: (I) A person selling or trading secondhand property so long as such property was not originally purchased for resale and so long as such person does not sell or trade secondhand property more than five weekend periods in any one calendar year, as verified by a declaration to be prepared by the seller. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
This fall term, the United States Supreme Court will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:36 am by Pierre Gooding
Unfortunately the “seller” (Lord Corporation) already had a buyer (CFMT of FL, LLC) lined up prior to Brady engaging in this activity. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Both the money and the land in such a transaction are consideration; neither is more important to the public, although at the time of the transaction the money is more important to the seller and the land is more important to the buyer. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Both the money and the land in such a transaction are consideration; neither is more important to the public, although at the time of the transaction the money is more important to the seller and the land is more important to the buyer. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
When additional electrical problems developed, the seller, who had warranted the yacht, directed the taxpayer to take it to Puerto Rico. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:35 am by Kyle Hulten
Key takeaways If you are an issuer or seller of securities, you need to be extremely careful to ensure that you are not making material omissions. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]